| Title |
Possible Role of Catheters in Saccharomyces boulardii Fungemia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, February 2000
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s100960050003 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
C. Hennequin, C. Kauffmann-Lacroix, A. Jobert, J. P. Viard, C. Ricour, J. L. Jacquemin, P. Berche |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 68 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 21% |
| Researcher | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 18% |
| Unknown | 18 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 28% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 12% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 20 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2020.
All research outputs
#2,383,269
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
#146
of 3,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,419
of 113,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them