↓ Skip to main content

Turner syndrome revisited: review of new data supports the hypothesis that all viable 45,X cases are cryptic mosaics with a rescue cell line, implying an origin by mitotic loss

Overview of attention for article published in Human Genetics, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
186 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
Title
Turner syndrome revisited: review of new data supports the hypothesis that all viable 45,X cases are cryptic mosaics with a rescue cell line, implying an origin by mitotic loss
Published in
Human Genetics, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00439-014-1420-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ernest B. Hook, Dorothy Warburton

Abstract

We review the data pertinent to the hypothesis we proposed three decades ago, that all embryos that survive gestation as women with Turner syndrome and have an ostensibly non-mosaic 45,X karyotype, actually are cryptic mosaics for a "rescue line" that includes a viable karyotype. Reanalysis of the prevalence and frequency of 45,X in available data on spontaneous abortuses, and livebirths, confirms prior estimates that 1 % to 1.5 % of all recognizable pregnancies start as an apparent non-mosaic 45,X but about 99 % do not survive gestation. From the rates of 45,X in early embryos, which are notably higher than the inferred rate of gametes hypohaploid for a sex chromosome, as well as the negative maternal age association with 45,X of maternal origin we deduce, in agreement with but on independent grounds from Hall et al. (2006), that a very large proportion of 45,X embryos acquired their 45,X line after fertilization. Results of a search for mosaic cell lines in patients with "Turner syndrome" in several reports indicate that not only does the detection rate of a mosaic line depend upon the number and sensitivity of the markers used, and the number of different tissues examined, but also upon the severity of the phenotype of those cases studied, and the number of cells karyotyped initially. Such factors may explain variation in the extent of detected "cryptic" mosaicism in 45,X individuals (currently at least 50 %). We note a report by Urbach and Benvenitsy (2009) of a gene necessary for placental function, PSF2RA, which lies in the pseudoautosomal-one region of the X and Y chromosomes. Deletion of such a gene could account for the high embryonic lethality in 45,X conceptions, and a rescue line in the placenta could account for embryonic and fetal survival of those cases in which a cryptic mosaic line cannot be found in the usual studies of blood and other tissues from affected individuals. Our primary conclusions are 1) all 45,X individuals with Turner syndrome are cryptic mosaics, 2) absence of the X chromosome in 45,X embryos is caused primarily by mitotic factors, and 3) the placenta is a strong candidate for the location of the rescue line in apparently non-mosaic 45,X individuals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 138 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 17%
Researcher 21 15%
Student > Master 16 12%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Other 13 9%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 33 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Psychology 2 1%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 37 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2019.
All research outputs
#6,938,510
of 22,749,166 outputs
Outputs from Human Genetics
#851
of 2,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,606
of 307,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genetics
#15
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,749,166 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,450 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.