↓ Skip to main content

Patients’ Perspectives on the Management of Emotional Distress in Primary Care Settings

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, February 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
127 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
Title
Patients’ Perspectives on the Management of Emotional Distress in Primary Care Settings
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, February 2002
DOI 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.00070.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

David S. Brody, Amir A. Khaliq, Troy L. Thompson

Abstract

To investigate how important treatment for emotional distress is to primary care patients in general and to primary care patients with depression, and to evaluate the types of mental health interventions they desire. Patient surveys. Five private primary care practices. Patients' desire for treatment of emotional distress and for specific types of mental health interventions were measured, as well as patients' ratings of the impact of emotional distress, the frequency of depressive symptoms, and mental health functioning. Of the 403 patients, 33% felt that it was "somewhat important" and 30% thought it was "extremely important" that their physician tries to help them with their emotional distress. Patient desire for this help was significantly related to a diagnosis of depression (p < .001), perceptions about the impact of emotional distress (p < .001), and mental health functioning (p < .001). Among patients with presumptive diagnoses of major and minor depression, 84% and 79%, respectively, felt that it was at least somewhat important that they receive this help from their physician. Sixty-one percent of all primary care patients surveyed and 69% of depressed patients desired counseling: 23% of all patients and 33% of depressed patients wanted a medication: and 11% of all patients and 5% of depressed patients desired a referral to a mental health specialist. A majority of these primary care patients and almost all of the depressed patients felt that it was at least somewhat important to receive help from their physician for emotional distress. The desire for this help seems to be related to the severity of the mental health problem. Most of the patients wanted counseling, but relatively few desired a referral to a mental health specialist.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Austria 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 50 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 20%
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Master 5 9%
Other 4 7%
Professor 3 6%
Other 15 28%
Unknown 8 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 17 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 30%
Social Sciences 6 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 9 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2017.
All research outputs
#4,835,823
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#2,992
of 8,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,639
of 49,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#20
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,173 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 49,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.