↓ Skip to main content

Reproduction and identification of ancient dairy products in South Asia based on the old and middle Indo-Aryan literatures, "Vedic ritual" and "Pāli canon"

Overview of attention for article published in Nihon Chikusan Gakkaiho, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#22 of 156)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reproduction and identification of ancient dairy products in South Asia based on the old and middle Indo-Aryan literatures, "Vedic ritual" and "Pāli canon"
Published in
Nihon Chikusan Gakkaiho, January 2013
DOI 10.2508/chikusan.84.175
Authors

Masahiro HIRATA, Nozomi ITAGAKI, Kenji UCHIDA, Masaaki HANADA, Masahito KAWAI

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2021.
All research outputs
#7,300,474
of 25,318,210 outputs
Outputs from Nihon Chikusan Gakkaiho
#22
of 156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,342
of 293,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon Chikusan Gakkaiho
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,318,210 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 156 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,673 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them