Title |
Melorheostosis: a review of 23 cases
|
---|---|
Published in |
European Radiology, February 2001
|
DOI | 10.1007/s003300000562 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
J. Freyschmidt |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 8 | 19% |
Other | 5 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 10% |
Professor | 4 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 10% |
Other | 15 | 36% |
Unknown | 2 | 5% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 71% |
Unspecified | 3 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 7 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2020.
All research outputs
#4,836,328
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#573
of 4,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,493
of 113,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,978 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,963 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.