↓ Skip to main content

System Configuration and Operation Plan of Hayabusa2 DCAM3-D Camera System for Scientific Observation During SCI Impact Experiment

Overview of attention for article published in Space Science Reviews, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
System Configuration and Operation Plan of Hayabusa2 DCAM3-D Camera System for Scientific Observation During SCI Impact Experiment
Published in
Space Science Reviews, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11214-017-0347-7
Authors

Kazunori Ogawa, Kei Shirai, Hirotaka Sawada, Masahiko Arakawa, Rie Honda, Koji Wada, Ko Ishibashi, Yu-ichi Iijima, Naoya Sakatani, Satoru Nakazawa, Hajime Hayakawa

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 20%
Professor 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Student > Master 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 3 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 5 33%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 20%
Computer Science 2 13%
Social Sciences 1 7%
Engineering 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2019.
All research outputs
#5,038,031
of 24,144,324 outputs
Outputs from Space Science Reviews
#327
of 1,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,390
of 312,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Space Science Reviews
#11
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,144,324 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,153 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,876 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.