↓ Skip to main content

Skeletal muscle telomere length in healthy, experienced, endurance runners

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Applied Physiology, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
Title
Skeletal muscle telomere length in healthy, experienced, endurance runners
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology, January 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00421-010-1353-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dale E. Rae, Alban Vignaud, Gillian S. Butler-Browne, Lars-Eric Thornell, Colin Sinclair-Smith, E. Wayne Derman, Mike I. Lambert, Malcolm Collins

Abstract

Measuring the DNA telomere length of skeletal muscle in experienced endurance runners may contribute to our understanding of the effects of chronic exposure to endurance exercise on skeletal muscle. This study compared the minimum terminal restriction fragment (TRF) length in the vastus lateralis muscle of 18 experienced endurance runners (mean age: 42 +/- 7 years) to those of 19 sedentary individuals (mean age: 39 +/- 10 years). The runners had covered almost 50,000 km in training and racing over 15 years. Minimum TRF lengths measured in the muscle of both groups were similar (P = 0.805) and within the normal range. Minimum TRF length in the runners, however, was inversely related to their years spent running (r = -0.63, P = 0.007) and hours spent training (r = -0.52, P = 0.035). Therefore, since exposure to endurance running may influence minimum TRF length, and by implication, the proliferative potential of the satellite cells, chronic endurance running may be seen as a stressor to skeletal muscle.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
France 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Norway 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 68 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 19%
Researcher 11 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Professor 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 15 20%
Unknown 12 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 24%
Sports and Recreations 13 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 18 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2011.
All research outputs
#6,407,574
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#1,643
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,584
of 172,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#14
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,175 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.