| Title |
Chickens prefer beautiful humans
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Human Nature, September 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12110-002-1021-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stefano Ghirlanda, Liselotte Jansson, Magnus Enquist |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 241 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 45 | 19% |
| United States | 12 | 5% |
| Spain | 9 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 3% |
| Japan | 4 | 2% |
| Australia | 3 | 1% |
| Italy | 3 | 1% |
| Belgium | 2 | <1% |
| Cameroon | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 23 | 10% |
| Unknown | 131 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 222 | 92% |
| Scientists | 15 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| France | 2 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 3% |
| Unknown | 168 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 45 | 24% |
| Researcher | 36 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 12% |
| Professor | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 23 | 12% |
| Unknown | 25 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 57 | 30% |
| Psychology | 47 | 25% |
| Arts and Humanities | 9 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 37 | 20% |
| Unknown | 28 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 267. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2023.
All research outputs
#137,464
of 25,718,113 outputs
Outputs from Human Nature
#13
of 551 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82
of 49,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Nature
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,718,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 551 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 49,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them