| Title |
A comparison of radio-frequency biomotion sensors and actigraphy versus polysomnography for the assessment of sleep in normal subjects
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Sleep and Breathing, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11325-014-0967-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emer O’Hare, David Flanagan, Thomas Penzel, Carmen Garcia, Daniela Frohberg, Conor Heneghan |
| Abstract |
This paper aims to compare the absolute performance of three noncontact sleep measurement devices for measuring sleep parameters in normal subjects against polysomnography and to assess their relative performance. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 91 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 17% |
| Unknown | 23 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 12 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 10 | 11% |
| Psychology | 6 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 23% |
| Unknown | 27 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2022.
All research outputs
#5,951,026
of 23,016,919 outputs
Outputs from Sleep and Breathing
#211
of 1,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,109
of 221,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sleep and Breathing
#7
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,016,919 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,399 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,460 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.