↓ Skip to main content

Surface molecular property modifications for poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) based microfluidic devices

Overview of attention for article published in Microfluidics and Nanofluidics, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 497)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
427 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
870 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Surface molecular property modifications for poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) based microfluidic devices
Published in
Microfluidics and Nanofluidics, April 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10404-009-0443-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ieong Wong, Chih-Ming Ho

Abstract

Fast advancements of microfabrication processes in past two decades have reached to a fairly matured stage that we can manufacture a wide range of microfluidic devices. At present, the main challenge is the control of nanoscale properties on the surface of lab-on-a-chip to satisfy the need for biomedical applications. For example, poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) is a commonly used material for microfluidic circuitry, yet the hydrophobic nature of PDMS surface suffers serious nonspecific protein adsorption. Thus the current major efforts are focused on surface molecular property treatments for satisfying specific needs in handling macro functional molecules. Reviewing surface modifications of all types of materials used in microfluidics will be too broad. This review will only summarize recent advances in nonbiofouling PDMS surface modification strategies applicable to microfluidic technology and classify them into two main categories: (1) physical approach including physisorption of charged or amphiphilic polymers and copolymers, as well as (2) chemical approach including self assembled monolayer and thick polymer coating. Pros and cons of a collection of available yet fully exploited surface modification methods are briefly compared among subcategories.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 870 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 14 2%
Germany 5 <1%
Switzerland 5 <1%
France 4 <1%
Denmark 4 <1%
Canada 4 <1%
Portugal 3 <1%
Singapore 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Other 26 3%
Unknown 799 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 262 30%
Researcher 159 18%
Student > Master 122 14%
Student > Bachelor 79 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 51 6%
Other 94 11%
Unknown 103 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 265 30%
Chemistry 116 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 98 11%
Materials Science 87 10%
Physics and Astronomy 54 6%
Other 117 13%
Unknown 133 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2021.
All research outputs
#3,248,650
of 22,649,029 outputs
Outputs from Microfluidics and Nanofluidics
#26
of 497 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,257
of 92,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microfluidics and Nanofluidics
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,649,029 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 497 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,934 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.