| Title |
Spatial variability during gait initiation while dual tasking is increased in individuals with mild cognitive impairment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The journal of nutrition, health & aging, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12603-013-0390-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
S. Boripuntakul, S.R. Lord, M.A.D. Brodie, S.T. Smith, P. Methapatara, N. Wongpakaran, Somporn Sungkarat |
| Abstract |
Gait initiation (GI) is a complex transition phase of gait that can induce postural instability. Gait impairment has been well documented in people with Alzheimer's disease, but it is still inconclusive in individuals with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). Previous studies have usually investigated gait performance of cognitive impaired persons under steady state walking. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 103 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 17% |
| Researcher | 12 | 11% |
| Professor | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 29 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 23% |
| Neuroscience | 12 | 11% |
| Psychology | 8 | 7% |
| Engineering | 8 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 12% |
| Unknown | 37 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2020.
All research outputs
#7,333,477
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from The journal of nutrition, health & aging
#912
of 2,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,108
of 237,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The journal of nutrition, health & aging
#14
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,108 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.