| Title |
The use of specimen-label databases for conservation purposes: an example using Mexican Papilionid and Pierid butterflies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, October 2000
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1008987010383 |
| Authors |
Jorge M. Soberón, Jorge B. Llorente, Leonor Oñate |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 5 | 3% |
| United States | 5 | 3% |
| Brazil | 5 | 3% |
| Spain | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Unknown | 136 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 47 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 26 | 15% |
| Unknown | 16 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 96 | 56% |
| Environmental Science | 35 | 21% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 4% |
| Unknown | 20 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2014.
All research outputs
#3,798,945
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#573
of 2,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,622
of 38,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,422 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 38,859 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them