| Title |
Are dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillators really better than single-chamber ones? A systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10840-014-9873-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bing-Wei Chen, Qing Liu, Xu Wang, Ai-Min Dang |
| Abstract |
Although dual-chamber (DC) cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) offer theoretical advantage over single-chamber (SC) ICDs, clinical studies showed conflicting results. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare DC and SC ICDs. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 3 | 75% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 4 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 15% |
| Professor | 2 | 10% |
| Librarian | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 15% |
| Unknown | 6 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 50% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Psychology | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 35% |