↓ Skip to main content

Adrenaline for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Overview of attention for article published in Resuscitation, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
9 blogs
twitter
79 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
135 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
250 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adrenaline for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Published in
Resuscitation, March 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.03.008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steve Lin, Clifton W. Callaway, Prakesh S. Shah, Justin D. Wagner, Joseph Beyene, Carolyn P. Ziegler, Laurie J. Morrison

Abstract

The evidence for adrenaline in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) resuscitation is inconclusive. We systematically reviewed the efficacy of adrenaline for adult OHCA.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 79 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 250 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 241 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 51 20%
Other 29 12%
Researcher 25 10%
Student > Master 25 10%
Student > Postgraduate 20 8%
Other 50 20%
Unknown 50 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 136 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Other 15 6%
Unknown 58 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 105. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2023.
All research outputs
#402,303
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Resuscitation
#63
of 5,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,374
of 235,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Resuscitation
#1
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,693 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,378 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.