↓ Skip to main content

Toxin-producing cyanobacteria in freshwater: A review of the problems, impact on drinking water safety, and efforts for protecting public health

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Microbiology, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
176 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
349 Mendeley
Title
Toxin-producing cyanobacteria in freshwater: A review of the problems, impact on drinking water safety, and efforts for protecting public health
Published in
Journal of Microbiology, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/s12275-013-2549-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Melissa Y. Cheung, Song Liang, Jiyoung Lee

Abstract

Cyanobacteria have adapted to survive in a variety of environments and have been found globally. Toxin-producing cyanobacterial harmful algal blooms (CHABs) have been increasing in frequency worldwide and pose a threat to drinking and recreational water. In this study, the prevalence, impact of CHABs and mitigation efforts were reviewed, focusing on the Lake Erie region and Ohio's inland lakes that have been impacted heavily as an example so that the findings can be transferrable to other parts of the world that face the similar problems due to the CHABs in their freshwater environments. This paper provides a basic introduction to CHABs and their toxins as well as an overview of public health implications including exposure routes, health effects, and drinking water issues, algal bloom advisory practices in Ohio, toxin measurements results in Ohio public water supplies, and mitigation efforts.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 349 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Faroe Islands 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 337 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 68 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 15%
Researcher 49 14%
Student > Bachelor 41 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 6%
Other 33 9%
Unknown 86 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 72 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 67 19%
Engineering 27 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 3%
Other 43 12%
Unknown 104 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2019.
All research outputs
#4,855,385
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Microbiology
#80
of 842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,221
of 196,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Microbiology
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 842 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,933 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them