| Title |
Classifying conservation targets based on the origin of motivation: implications over the success of community-based conservation projects
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-014-0659-9 |
| Authors |
Tamia Souto, Jessica L. Deichmann, Cecilia Núñez, Alfonso Alonso |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 108 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 18% |
| Researcher | 17 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 18% |
| Unknown | 18 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 34 | 30% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 33 | 29% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 10% |
| Arts and Humanities | 5 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 21 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2019.
All research outputs
#14,495,952
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#1,757
of 2,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,063
of 224,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#25
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,324 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.