↓ Skip to main content

Risk Analysis for Biological Hazards: What We Need to Know about Invasive Species

Overview of attention for article published in Risk Analysis: An International Journal, December 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
197 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
388 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Risk Analysis for Biological Hazards: What We Need to Know about Invasive Species
Published in
Risk Analysis: An International Journal, December 2005
DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00707.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas J Stohlgren, John L Schnase

Abstract

Risk analysis for biological invasions is similar to other types of natural and human hazards. For example, risk analysis for chemical spills requires the evaluation of basic information on where a spill occurs; exposure level and toxicity of the chemical agent; knowledge of the physical processes involved in its rate and direction of spread; and potential impacts to the environment, economy, and human health relative to containment costs. Unlike typical chemical spills, biological invasions can have long lag times from introduction and establishment to successful invasion, they reproduce, and they can spread rapidly by physical and biological processes. We use a risk analysis framework to suggest a general strategy for risk analysis for invasive species and invaded habitats. It requires: (1) problem formation (scoping the problem, defining assessment endpoints); (2) analysis (information on species traits, matching species traits to suitable habitats, estimating exposure, surveys of current distribution and abundance); (3) risk characterization (understanding of data completeness, estimates of the "potential" distribution and abundance; estimates of the potential rate of spread; and probable risks, impacts, and costs); and (4) risk management (containment potential, costs, and opportunity costs; legal mandates and social considerations and information science and technology needs).

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 388 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 2%
Brazil 4 1%
Argentina 3 <1%
South Africa 3 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Other 9 2%
Unknown 351 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 93 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 68 18%
Student > Master 60 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 6%
Student > Bachelor 21 5%
Other 79 20%
Unknown 45 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 180 46%
Environmental Science 106 27%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 3%
Social Sciences 6 2%
Engineering 5 1%
Other 25 6%
Unknown 56 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2019.
All research outputs
#3,061,032
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Risk Analysis: An International Journal
#475
of 2,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,093
of 172,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Risk Analysis: An International Journal
#8
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,444 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,355 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.