↓ Skip to main content

What interventions improve walking ability in neurogenic claudication with lumbar spinal stenosis? A systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in European Spine Journal, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
Title
What interventions improve walking ability in neurogenic claudication with lumbar spinal stenosis? A systematic review
Published in
European Spine Journal, March 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00586-014-3262-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carlo Ammendolia, Kent Stuber, Christy Tomkins-Lane, Michael Schneider, Y. Raja Rampersaud, Andrea D. Furlan, Carol A. Kennedy

Abstract

To investigate what interventions can improve walking ability in neurogenic claudication with lumbar spinal stenosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 153 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 14%
Other 19 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 12%
Researcher 18 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 10%
Other 33 21%
Unknown 31 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 13%
Sports and Recreations 9 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 36 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2022.
All research outputs
#5,437,781
of 22,749,166 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#609
of 4,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,608
of 221,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#11
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,749,166 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,610 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,161 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.