↓ Skip to main content

Why is Data Sharing in Collaborative Natural Resource Efforts so Hard and What can We Do to Improve it?

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Management, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Why is Data Sharing in Collaborative Natural Resource Efforts so Hard and What can We Do to Improve it?
Published in
Environmental Management, March 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00267-014-0258-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carol J. Volk, Yasmin Lucero, Katie Barnas

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 63 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 15%
Librarian 9 14%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 9 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 17%
Environmental Science 10 15%
Social Sciences 8 12%
Computer Science 6 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 8%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 13 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2014.
All research outputs
#16,681,672
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Management
#1,515
of 2,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,657
of 239,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Management
#25
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,036 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,706 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.