↓ Skip to main content

Thermoresponsive Worms for Expansion and Release of Human Embryonic Stem Cells

Overview of attention for article published in Biomacromolecules, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Thermoresponsive Worms for Expansion and Release of Human Embryonic Stem Cells
Published in
Biomacromolecules, February 2014
DOI 10.1021/bm401702h
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaoli Chen, Andrew B. J. Prowse, Zhongfan Jia, Helena Tellier, Trent P. Munro, Peter P. Gray, Michael J. Monteiro

Abstract

The development of robust suspension cultures of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) without the use of cell membrane disrupting enzymes or inhibitors is critical for future clinical applications in regenerative medicine. We have achieved this by using long, flexible, and thermoresponsive polymer worms decorated with a recombinant vitronectin subdomain that bridge hESCs, aiding in hESC's natural ability to form embryoid bodies (EBs) and satisfying their inherent requirement for cell-cell and cell-extracellular matrix contact. When the EBs reached an optimal upper size where cytokine and nutrient penetration becomes limiting, these long and flexible polymer worms facilitated EB breakdown via a temperature shift from 37 to 25 °C. The thermoresponsive nature of the worms enabled a cyclical dissociation and propagation of the cells. Repeating the process for three cycles (over eighteen days) provided a >30-fold expansion in cell number while maintaining pluripotency, thereby providing a simple, nondestructive process for the 3D expansion of hESC.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 3%
Unknown 35 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 31%
Other 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 11 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 14%
Chemical Engineering 3 8%
Engineering 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 6 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2019.
All research outputs
#2,932,093
of 22,749,166 outputs
Outputs from Biomacromolecules
#293
of 4,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,771
of 221,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomacromolecules
#7
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,749,166 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,390 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,191 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.