| Title |
Frames and Ambivalence in Context: An Analysis of Hands-On Experts’ Perception of the Welfare of Animals in Traveling Circuses in The Netherlands
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, April 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10806-010-9252-8 |
| Authors |
Hanneke J. Nijland, Noelle M. C. Aarts, Reint Jan Renes |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 30 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 13% |
| Researcher | 2 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 19% |
| Unknown | 6 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 10 | 32% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 16% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 10% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 6 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2015.
All research outputs
#2,192,418
of 23,275,636 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics
#58
of 405 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,217
of 96,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,275,636 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 405 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them