↓ Skip to main content

Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Quantitation of Poly(ADP-Ribose) by Isotope Dilution Mass Spectrometry
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Quantification of PARP Activity in Human Tissues: Ex Vivo Assays in Blood Cells and Immunohistochemistry in Human Biopsies
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Detecting and Quantifying pADPr In Vivo
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Compartment-Specific Poly-ADP-Ribose Formation as a Biosensor for Subcellular NAD Pools
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Cell Cycle Resolved Measurements of Poly(ADP-Ribose) Formation and DNA Damage Signaling by Quantitative Image-Based Cytometry
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Detecting Protein ADP-Ribosylation Using a Clickable Aminooxy Probe
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 ADP-Ribosylated Peptide Enrichment and Site Identification: The Phosphodiesterase-Based Method
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Using Clickable NAD+ Analogs to Label Substrate Proteins of PARPs
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Identification of Protein Substrates of Specific PARP Enzymes Using Analog-Sensitive PARP Mutants and a “Clickable” NAD+ Analog
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Identification of ADP-Ribose Acceptor Sites on In Vitro Modified Proteins by Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Proteome-Wide Identification of In Vivo ADP-Ribose Acceptor Sites by Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Poly(ADP-Ribose)-Dependent Chromatin Remodeling in DNA Repair
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Methods to Assess the Role of Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerases in Regulating Mitochondrial Oxidation
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Approaches for Investigating Translational Regulation Controlled by PARP1: Biotin-Based UV Cross-Linking and Luciferase Reporter Assay
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Methodology to Identify Poly-ADP-Ribose Polymerase 1 (PARP1)–mRNA Targets by PAR-CLiP
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Biochemical and Biophysical Methods for Analysis of Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase 1 and Its Interactions with Chromatin
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 PARP-1 Interaction with and Activation by Histones and Nucleosomes
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Strategies Employed for the Development of PARP Inhibitors
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 High-Throughput Colorimetric Assay for Identifying PARP-1 Inhibitors Using a Large Small-Molecule Collection
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Testing PARP Inhibitors Using a Murine Xenograft Model
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 In Vitro Long-Term Proliferation Assays to Study Antiproliferative Effects of PARP Inhibitors on Cancer Cells
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Use of Inosine Monophosphate Dehydrogenase Activity Assay to Determine the Specificity of PARP-1 Inhibitors
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 The Use of PARP Inhibitors in Cancer Therapy: Use as Adjuvant with Chemotherapy or Radiotherapy, Use as a Single Agent in Susceptible Patients, and Techniques Used to Identify Susceptible Patients
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Purification of Recombinant Human PARP-3
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 Purification of Recombinant Human PARG and Activity Assays
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 Studying Catabolism of Protein ADP-Ribosylation
  28. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 27 Purification of DNA Damage-Dependent PARPs from E. coli for Structural and Biochemical Analysis
  29. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 28 Identifying and Validating Tankyrase Binders and Substrates: A Candidate Approach
  30. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 29 Computational and Experimental Studies of ADP-Ribosylation
  31. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 30 Erratum to: Methodology to Identify Poly-ADP-Ribose Polymerase 1 (PARP1)–mRNA Targets by PAR-CLiP
Attention for Chapter 10: Identification of ADP-Ribose Acceptor Sites on In Vitro Modified Proteins by Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Identification of ADP-Ribose Acceptor Sites on In Vitro Modified Proteins by Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry
Chapter number 10
Book title
Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-6993-7_10
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-6992-0, 978-1-4939-6993-7
Authors

Mario Leutert, Vera Bilan, Peter Gehrig, Michael O. Hottiger

Abstract

Protein ADP-ribosylation is a covalent, reversible posttranslational modification (PTM) catalyzed by ADP-ribosyltransferases (ARTs). Proteins can be either mono- or poly-ADP-ribosylated under a variety of physiological and pathological conditions. To understand the functional contribution of protein ADP-ribosylation to normal and disease/stress states, modified protein and corresponding ADP-ribose acceptor site identification is crucial. Since ADP-ribosylation is a transient and relatively low abundant PTM, systematic and accurate identification of ADP-ribose acceptor sites has only recently become feasible. This is due to the development of specific ADP-ribosylated protein/peptide enrichment methodologies, as well as technical advances in high-accuracy liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The standardized protocol described here allows the identification of ADP-ribose acceptor sites in in vitro ADP-ribosylated proteins and will, thus, contribute to the functional characterization of this important PTM.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 1 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Researcher 1 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 25%
Unknown 3 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2017.
All research outputs
#14,945,861
of 22,988,380 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#4,722
of 13,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,973
of 312,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#67
of 253 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,988,380 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,150 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 253 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.