↓ Skip to main content

Preventing fatal diseases increases healthcare costs: cause elimination life table approach

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, January 1998
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
4 policy sources
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Preventing fatal diseases increases healthcare costs: cause elimination life table approach
Published in
British Medical Journal, January 1998
DOI 10.1136/bmj.316.7124.26
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luc Bonneux, Jan J Barendregt, Wilma J Nusselder, Paul J Van der Maas

Abstract

To examine whether elimination of fatal diseases will increase healthcare costs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 4%
Brazil 2 4%
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 45 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 22%
Researcher 10 20%
Student > Master 8 16%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Professor 4 8%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 4 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 38%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 14%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 8 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2015.
All research outputs
#2,437,547
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#20,971
of 64,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,425
of 94,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#26
of 191 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64,464 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,774 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 191 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.