You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Preventing fatal diseases increases healthcare costs: cause elimination life table approach
|
---|---|
Published in |
British Medical Journal, January 1998
|
DOI | 10.1136/bmj.316.7124.26 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Luc Bonneux, Jan J Barendregt, Wilma J Nusselder, Paul J Van der Maas |
Abstract |
To examine whether elimination of fatal diseases will increase healthcare costs. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 2 | 67% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
Brazil | 2 | 4% |
Spain | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 45 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 22% |
Researcher | 10 | 20% |
Student > Master | 8 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
Professor | 4 | 8% |
Other | 8 | 16% |
Unknown | 4 | 8% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 38% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 7 | 14% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
Other | 8 | 16% |
Unknown | 8 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2015.
All research outputs
#2,437,547
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#20,971
of 64,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,425
of 94,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#26
of 191 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64,464 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,774 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 191 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.