↓ Skip to main content

Social attitudes differentially modulate imitation in adolescents and adults

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Brain Research, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
Title
Social attitudes differentially modulate imitation in adolescents and adults
Published in
Experimental Brain Research, February 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00221-011-2584-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer Cook, Geoffrey Bird

Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated a bidirectional relationship between social attitudes and imitation in adults: pro-social attitudes promote imitation, and imitation further increases positive social attitudes. Social attitudes and the social brain are developing throughout the adolescent years. Thus, the aim of this study was to test whether pro-social attitudes promote imitation in an Adolescent Group to the same extent as in an Adult Group. Participants were primed with pro-social or non-social words in a Scrambled Sentence Priming task. They then completed an Imitation task wherein participants were required to perform a lift action with either the index or middle finger, whilst observing either a compatible action (e.g. index finger response and observed index finger lift) or an incompatible action (e.g. index finger response and observed middle finger lift). In an Effector Priming control condition, observed fingers remained stationary but a semi-transparent green mask was added to either the compatible or incompatible finger. The magnitude of the Imitation Effect and Effector Priming Effect was calculated by subtracting reaction times on compatible trials from those on incompatible trials. In the Adult Group, social priming specifically modulated the Imitation Effect: pro-social priming produced a larger Imitation Effect but did not modulate the Effector Priming Effect. In adolescents, however, no effect of social priming was seen on either the Imitation or Effector Priming measures. We consider possible explanations for these results including the immature development of social brain regions and reduced experience of the relationship between social attitudes and imitation in adolescence.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
United States 3 2%
Canada 2 1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 148 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 29%
Researcher 24 15%
Student > Master 18 11%
Student > Bachelor 18 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 25 16%
Unknown 21 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 84 53%
Social Sciences 10 6%
Neuroscience 8 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Other 21 13%
Unknown 28 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2014.
All research outputs
#3,775,741
of 22,749,166 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Brain Research
#314
of 3,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,491
of 106,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Brain Research
#7
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,749,166 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,220 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.