↓ Skip to main content

Wheelchair pushing and turning: lumbar spine and shoulder loads and recommended limits

Overview of attention for article published in Ergonomics, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Wheelchair pushing and turning: lumbar spine and shoulder loads and recommended limits
Published in
Ergonomics, June 2017
DOI 10.1080/00140139.2017.1344445
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eric B. Weston, Safdar N. Khan, William S. Marras

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine how simulated manual wheelchair pushing influences biomechanical loading to the lumbar spine and shoulders. 62 subjects performed simulated wheelchair pushing and turning in a laboratory. An electromyography-assisted biomechanical model was used to estimate spinal loads. Moments at the shoulder joint, external hand forces, and net turning torque were also assessed. Multiple linear regression techniques were employed to develop biomechanically-based wheelchair pushing guidelines relating resultant hand force or net torque to spinal load. Male subjects experienced significantly greater spinal loading (p<0.01), and spine loads were also increased for wheelchair turning compared to straight wheelchair pushing (p<0.001). Biomechanically-determined maximum acceptable resultant hand forces were 17-18% lower than psychophysically determined limits. We conclude that manual wheelchair pushing and turning can pose biomechanical risk to the lumbar spine and shoulders. Psychophysically-determined maximum acceptable push forces do not appear to be protective enough of this biomechanical risk. Practitioner Summary This laboratory study investigated biomechanical risk to the low back and shoulders during simulated wheelchair pushing. Manual wheelchair pushing posed biomechanical risk to the lumbar spine (in compression and A/P shear) and to the shoulders. Biomechanically-determined wheelchair pushing thresholds are presented and are more protective than the closest psychophysically-determined equivalents.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 28%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Other 4 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Unspecified 3 5%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 15 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 16 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Neuroscience 3 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 20 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2017.
All research outputs
#853,816
of 25,046,511 outputs
Outputs from Ergonomics
#68
of 2,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,835
of 321,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ergonomics
#3
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,046,511 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,198 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.