| Title |
Which Behaviour Change Techniques Are Most Effective at Increasing Older Adults’ Self-Efficacy and Physical Activity Behaviour? A Systematic Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Behavioral Medicine, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12160-014-9593-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David P French, Ellinor K Olander, Anna Chisholm, Jennifer Mc Sharry |
| Abstract |
Increasing self-efficacy is an effective mechanism for increasing physical activity, especially for older people. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 32% |
| United States | 2 | 7% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 7% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Finland | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Denmark | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 12 | 43% |
| Members of the public | 11 | 39% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 640 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 635 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 102 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 100 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 99 | 15% |
| Researcher | 61 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 28 | 4% |
| Other | 89 | 14% |
| Unknown | 161 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 131 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 78 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 66 | 10% |
| Sports and Recreations | 64 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 41 | 6% |
| Other | 77 | 12% |
| Unknown | 183 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2018.
All research outputs
#1,339,725
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#165
of 1,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,953
of 241,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#2
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,512 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.