You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Raltegravir and elvitegravir-resistance mutation E92Q affects HLA-B*40:02-restricted HIV-1-specific CTL recognition
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Microbes & Infection, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.micinf.2014.03.003 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mohammad Arif Rahman, Nozomi Kuse, Hayato Murakoshi, Takayuki Chikata, Hiroyuki Gatanaga, Shinichi Oka, Masafumi Takiguchi |
| Abstract |
Interplay between drug-resistance mutations in CTL epitopes and HIV-1-specific CTLs may influence the control of HIV-1 viremia. However, the effect of integrase inhibitor (INI)-resistance mutations on the CTL recognition has not been reported. We here investigated the effect of a raltegravir and elvitegravir-resistance mutation (E92Q) on HLA-B*40:02-restricted Int92-102 (EL11: ETGQETAYFLL)-specific CTLs. EL11-specific CTLs recognized E92Q peptide-pulsed and E92Q mutant virus-infected cells less effectively than EL11 peptide-pulsed and wild-type virus-infected cells, respectively. Ex vivo ELISpot analysis showed no induction of E92Q-specific T cells in chronically HIV-1-infected individuals. Thus, we demonstrated that EL11-specific CTL recognition was affected by the INI-resistance mutation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 13% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 20% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2014.
All research outputs
#15,998,913
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Microbes & Infection
#1,525
of 1,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,034
of 237,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbes & Infection
#19
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,999 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,077 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.