↓ Skip to main content

False polarization: debiasing as applied social epistemology

Overview of attention for article published in Synthese, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
False polarization: debiasing as applied social epistemology
Published in
Synthese, March 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11229-014-0438-x
Authors

Tim Kenyon

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Sweden 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 29 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Professor 3 9%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 8 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 8 25%
Social Sciences 5 16%
Computer Science 3 9%
Psychology 3 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 10 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2021.
All research outputs
#8,187,876
of 24,535,155 outputs
Outputs from Synthese
#897
of 2,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,437
of 228,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Synthese
#5
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,535,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,636 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,495 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.