| Title |
A meta-analysis of blended learning and technology use in higher education: from the general to the applied
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Computing in Higher Education, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12528-013-9077-3 |
| Authors |
Robert M. Bernard, Eugene Borokhovski, Richard F. Schmid, Rana M. Tamim, Philip C. Abrami |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 20% |
| Ireland | 1 | 7% |
| Uzbekistan | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Turkey | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 73% |
| Scientists | 4 | 27% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,053 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 3 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| Belgium | 3 | <1% |
| Chile | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Pakistan | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1018 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 150 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 124 | 12% |
| Lecturer | 94 | 9% |
| Researcher | 74 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 68 | 6% |
| Other | 231 | 22% |
| Unknown | 312 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 249 | 24% |
| Computer Science | 76 | 7% |
| Psychology | 64 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 49 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 42 | 4% |
| Other | 221 | 21% |
| Unknown | 352 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2022.
All research outputs
#2,091,051
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Computing in Higher Education
#11
of 282 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,858
of 329,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Computing in Higher Education
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 282 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,499 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them