| Title |
Healthful and Unhealthful Plant-Based Diets and the Risk of Coronary Heart Disease in U.S. Adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.05.047 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ambika Satija, Shilpa N. Bhupathiraju, Donna Spiegelman, Stephanie E. Chiuve, JoAnn E. Manson, Walter Willett, Kathryn M. Rexrode, Eric B. Rimm, Frank B. Hu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 488 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 117 | 24% |
| United Kingdom | 31 | 6% |
| Thailand | 19 | 4% |
| Spain | 16 | 3% |
| Canada | 15 | 3% |
| Australia | 7 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 5 | 1% |
| Finland | 5 | 1% |
| Mexico | 4 | <1% |
| Other | 38 | 8% |
| Unknown | 231 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 332 | 68% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 88 | 18% |
| Scientists | 57 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 10 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 825 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 825 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 125 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 120 | 15% |
| Researcher | 76 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 59 | 7% |
| Other | 44 | 5% |
| Other | 125 | 15% |
| Unknown | 276 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 142 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 137 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 58 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 33 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 19 | 2% |
| Other | 106 | 13% |
| Unknown | 330 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1832. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#5,530
of 25,779,988 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#11
of 16,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78
of 327,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#1
of 184 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,779,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,940 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 184 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.