| Title |
Reflective and Automatic Processes in Health Care Professional Behaviour: a Dual Process Model Tested Across Multiple Behaviours
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Behavioral Medicine, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12160-014-9609-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Justin Presseau, Marie Johnston, Tarja Heponiemi, Marko Elovainio, Jill J. Francis, Martin P. Eccles, Nick Steen, Susan Hrisos, Elaine Stamp, Jeremy M. Grimshaw, Gillian Hawthorne, Falko F. Sniehotta |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 18% |
| Canada | 3 | 18% |
| United States | 2 | 12% |
| Belgium | 1 | 6% |
| Chile | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Austria | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 8 | 47% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 24% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 123 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 20% |
| Researcher | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 22 | 17% |
| Unknown | 26 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 33 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 33 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2016.
All research outputs
#3,671,336
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#378
of 1,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,125
of 241,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#4
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,512 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.