↓ Skip to main content

Costing conservation: an expert appraisal of the pollinator habitat benefits of England’s entry level stewardship

Overview of attention for article published in Biodiversity and Conservation, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
Title
Costing conservation: an expert appraisal of the pollinator habitat benefits of England’s entry level stewardship
Published in
Biodiversity and Conservation, March 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10531-014-0660-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

T. D. Breeze, A. P. Bailey, K. G. Balcombe, S. G. Potts

Abstract

Pollination services provided by insects play a key role in English crop production and wider ecology. Despite growing evidence of the negative effects of habitat loss on pollinator populations, limited policy support is available to reverse this pressure. One measure that may provide beneficial habitat to pollinators is England's entry level stewardship agri-environment scheme. This study uses a novel expert survey to develop weights for a range of models which adjust the balance of Entry Level Stewardship options within the current area of spending. The annual costs of establishing and maintaining these option compositions were estimated at £59.3-£12.4 M above current expenditure. Although this produced substantial reduction in private cost:benefit ratios, the benefits of the scheme to pollinator habitat rose by 7-140 %; significantly increasing the public cost:benefit ratio. This study demonstrates that the scheme has significant untapped potential to provide good quality habitat for pollinators across England, even within existing expenditure. The findings should open debate on the costs and benefits of specific entry level stewardship management options and how these can be enhanced to benefit both participants and biodiversity more equitably.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 3%
Indonesia 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 83 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 23%
Researcher 15 17%
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 14 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 41%
Environmental Science 18 20%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 20 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2014.
All research outputs
#15,002,375
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#1,794
of 2,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,893
of 224,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#29
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,107 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.