↓ Skip to main content

Longitudinal assessment of neuropathy in type 1 diabetes using novel ophthalmic markers (LANDMark): Study design and baseline characteristics

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetes Research & Clinical Practice, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Longitudinal assessment of neuropathy in type 1 diabetes using novel ophthalmic markers (LANDMark): Study design and baseline characteristics
Published in
Diabetes Research & Clinical Practice, February 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.diabres.2014.02.011
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicola Pritchard, Katie Edwards, Cirous Dehghani, Hassan Fadavi, Maria Jeziorska, Andrew Marshall, Ioannis N. Petropoulos, Georgios Ponirakis, Anthony W. Russell, Geoff P. Sampson, Ayda M. Shahidi, Sangeetha Srinivasan, Mitra Tavakoli, Dimitrios Vagenas, Rayaz A. Malik, Nathan Efron

Abstract

Corneal nerve morphology and corneal sensation threshold have recently been explored as potential surrogate markers for the evaluation of diabetic neuropathy. We present the baseline findings of the 'Longitudinal Assessment of Neuropathy in type 1 Diabetes using novel ophthalmic Markers'(LANDMark) study.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Ireland 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 68 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 18%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Student > Master 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Other 18 25%
Unknown 17 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Engineering 3 4%
Unspecified 3 4%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 18 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2014.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Diabetes Research & Clinical Practice
#2,593
of 3,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,008
of 238,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetes Research & Clinical Practice
#28
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,191 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,968 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.