↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of single-molecule sequencing and hybrid approaches for finishing the genome of Clostridium autoethanogenum and analysis of CRISPR systems in industrial relevant Clostridia

Overview of attention for article published in Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#38 of 1,589)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
14 X users
patent
4 patents
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
131 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
270 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of single-molecule sequencing and hybrid approaches for finishing the genome of Clostridium autoethanogenum and analysis of CRISPR systems in industrial relevant Clostridia
Published in
Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/1754-6834-7-40
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steven D Brown, Shilpa Nagaraju, Sagar Utturkar, Sashini De Tissera, Simón Segovia, Wayne Mitchell, Miriam L Land, Asela Dassanayake, Michael Köpke

Abstract

Clostridium autoethanogenum strain JA1-1 (DSM 10061) is an acetogen capable of fermenting CO, CO2 and H2 (e.g. from syngas or waste gases) into biofuel ethanol and commodity chemicals such as 2,3-butanediol. A draft genome sequence consisting of 100 contigs has been published.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 270 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 1%
New Zealand 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Ireland 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 252 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 72 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 65 24%
Student > Master 32 12%
Student > Bachelor 22 8%
Other 13 5%
Other 31 11%
Unknown 35 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 107 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 73 27%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 4%
Engineering 10 4%
Chemical Engineering 8 3%
Other 19 7%
Unknown 43 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2022.
All research outputs
#1,412,661
of 25,877,363 outputs
Outputs from Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts
#38
of 1,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,584
of 238,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts
#3
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,877,363 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,589 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,167 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.