↓ Skip to main content

What can ecosystem models tell us about the risk of eutrophication in the North Sea?

Overview of attention for article published in Climatic Change, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
What can ecosystem models tell us about the risk of eutrophication in the North Sea?
Published in
Climatic Change, March 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10584-014-1071-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. Saux Picart, J. I. Allen, M. Butenschön, Y. Artioli, L. de Mora, S. Wakelin, J. Holt

Abstract

Eutrophication is a process resulting from an increase in anthropogenic nutrient inputs from rivers and other sources, the consequences of which can include enhanced algal biomass, changes in plankton community composition and oxygen depletion near the seabed. Within the context of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, indicators (and associated threshold) have been identified to assess the eutrophication status of an ecosystem. Large databases of observations (in situ) are required to properly assess the eutrophication status. Marine hydrodynamic/ecosystem models provide continuous fields of a wide range of ecosystem characteristics. Using such models in this context could help to overcome the lack of in situ data, and provide a powerful tool for ecosystem-based management and policy makers. Here we demonstrate a methodology that uses a combination of model outputs and in situ data to assess the risk of eutrophication in the coastal domain of the North Sea. The risk of eutrophication is computed for the past and present time as well as for different future scenarios. This allows us to assess both the current risk and its sensitivity to anthropogenic pressure and climate change. Model sensitivity studies suggest that the coastal waters of the North Sea may be more sensitive to anthropogenic rivers loads than climate change in the near future (to 2040).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 2%
Unknown 45 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 37%
Student > Master 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 6 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 15 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 26%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 8 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2015.
All research outputs
#14,777,143
of 22,749,166 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#5,292
of 5,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,102
of 223,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#53
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,749,166 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,665 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.