↓ Skip to main content

Bariatric Surgery in Class I Obesity

Overview of attention for article published in Obesity Surgery, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
Title
Bariatric Surgery in Class I Obesity
Published in
Obesity Surgery, March 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11695-014-1214-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luca Busetto, John Dixon, Maurizio De Luca, Scott Shikora, Walter Pories, Luigi Angrisani

Abstract

Class I obesity conveys an increased risk of comorbidities, impairs physical and mental health-related quality of life, and it is associated to an increased psychosocial burden, particularly in women. The need for effective and safe therapies for class I obesity is great and not yet met by nonsurgical approaches. Eligibility to bariatric surgery has been largely based on body mass index (BMI) cut points and limited to patients with more severe obesity levels. However, obese patients belonging to the same BMI class may have very different levels of health, risk, and impact of obesity on quality of life. Individual patients in class I obesity may have a comorbidity burden similar to, or greater than, patients with more severe obesity. Therefore, the denial of bariatric surgery to a patient with class I obesity suffering from a significant obesity-related health burden and not achieving weight control with nonsurgical therapy simply on the basis of the BMI level does not appear to be clinically justified. A clinical decision should be based on a more comprehensive evaluation of the patient's current global health and on a more reliable prediction of future morbidity and mortality. After a careful review of available data about safety and efficacy of bariatric surgery in patients with class I obesity, this panel reached a consensus on ten clinical recommendations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 133 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 13%
Other 15 11%
Student > Master 14 10%
Researcher 13 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 7%
Other 31 23%
Unknown 34 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Psychology 6 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 40 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2022.
All research outputs
#908,793
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from Obesity Surgery
#66
of 3,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,565
of 242,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Obesity Surgery
#2
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,361 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,800 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.