↓ Skip to main content

Cytoplasmic Accumulation and Aggregation of TDP-43 upon Proteasome Inhibition in Cultured Neurons

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
159 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cytoplasmic Accumulation and Aggregation of TDP-43 upon Proteasome Inhibition in Cultured Neurons
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0022850
Pubmed ID
Authors

Janet van Eersel, Yazi D. Ke, Amadeus Gladbach, Mian Bi, Jürgen Götz, Jillian J. Kril, Lars M. Ittner

Abstract

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) are characterized by intraneuronal deposition of the nuclear TAR DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43) caused by unknown mechanisms. Here, we studied TDP-43 in primary neurons under different stress conditions and found that only proteasome inhibition by MG-132 or lactacystin could induce significant cytoplasmic accumulation of TDP-43, a histopathological hallmark in disease. This cytoplasmic accumulation was accompanied by phosphorylation, ubiquitination and aggregation of TDP-43, recapitulating major features of disease. Proteasome inhibition produced similar effects in both hippocampal and cortical neurons, as well as in immortalized motor neurons. To determine the contribution of TDP-43 to cell death, we reduced TDP-43 expression using small interfering RNA (siRNA), and found that reduced levels of TDP-43 dose-dependently rendered neurons more vulnerable to MG-132. Taken together, our data suggests a role for the proteasome in subcellular localization of TDP-43, and possibly in disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 151 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 26%
Researcher 25 16%
Student > Master 17 11%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 31 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 17%
Neuroscience 25 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 33 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2011.
All research outputs
#18,293,967
of 22,649,029 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#153,633
of 193,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,935
of 119,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,778
of 2,284 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,649,029 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,361 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,284 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.