↓ Skip to main content

Momordica charantia (bitter melon) inhibits primary human adipocyte differentiation by modulating adipogenic genes

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
Title
Momordica charantia (bitter melon) inhibits primary human adipocyte differentiation by modulating adipogenic genes
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, June 2010
DOI 10.1186/1472-6882-10-34
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pratibha V Nerurkar, Yun-Kung Lee, Vivek R Nerurkar

Abstract

Escalating trends of obesity and associated type 2 diabetes (T2D) has prompted an increase in the use of alternative and complementary functional foods. Momordica charantia or bitter melon (BM) that is traditionally used to treat diabetes and complications has been demonstrated to alleviate hyperglycemia as well as reduce adiposity in rodents. However, its effects on human adipocytes remain unknown. The objective of our study was to investigate the effects of BM juice (BMJ) on lipid accumulation and adipocyte differentiation transcription factors in primary human differentiating preadipocytes and adipocytes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 86 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 16%
Student > Master 13 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 20 22%
Unknown 17 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 22 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2018.
All research outputs
#3,598,731
of 22,649,029 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#689
of 3,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,069
of 93,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#10
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,649,029 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,616 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,318 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.