| Title |
Creatine supplementation post-exercise does not enhance training-induced adaptations in middle to older aged males
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Applied Physiology, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00421-014-2866-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthew B. Cooke, Brian Brabham, Thomas W. Buford, Brian D. Shelmadine, Matthew McPheeters, Geoffrey M. Hudson, Christos Stathis, Mike Greenwood, Richard Kreider, Darryn S. Willoughby |
| Abstract |
The present study evaluated the effects of creatine monohydrate (CrM) consumption post-exercise on body composition and muscle strength in middle to older males following a 12-week resistance training program. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 24% |
| Spain | 3 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 10% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 7% |
| Qatar | 1 | 3% |
| Argentina | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 8 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 76% |
| Scientists | 4 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 217 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 41 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 7% |
| Researcher | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 41 | 19% |
| Unknown | 62 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 39 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 27 | 12% |
| Unknown | 66 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,444,660
of 25,464,544 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#460
of 4,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,175
of 236,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#9
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,464,544 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,364 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,149 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.