↓ Skip to main content

Three questions that patients can ask to improve the quality of information physicians give about treatment options: A cross-over trial

Overview of attention for article published in Patient Education & Counseling, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
48 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
183 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
274 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Three questions that patients can ask to improve the quality of information physicians give about treatment options: A cross-over trial
Published in
Patient Education & Counseling, August 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.pec.2011.07.022
Pubmed ID
Authors

Heather L. Shepherd, Alexandra Barratt, Lyndal J. Trevena, Kevin McGeechan, Karen Carey, Ronald M. Epstein, Phyllis N. Butow, Chris B. Del Mar, Vikki Entwistle, Martin H.N. Tattersall

Abstract

To test the effect of three questions (what are my options? what are the benefits and harms? and how likely are these?), on information provided by physicians about treatment options.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 274 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 3%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 262 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 18%
Student > Master 43 16%
Researcher 35 13%
Other 23 8%
Student > Bachelor 19 7%
Other 58 21%
Unknown 47 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 93 34%
Psychology 35 13%
Social Sciences 31 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 8%
Computer Science 5 2%
Other 24 9%
Unknown 64 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2022.
All research outputs
#751,091
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Patient Education & Counseling
#60
of 4,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,859
of 132,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient Education & Counseling
#4
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,194 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.