You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Three questions that patients can ask to improve the quality of information physicians give about treatment options: A cross-over trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Patient Education & Counseling, August 2011
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.pec.2011.07.022 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Heather L. Shepherd, Alexandra Barratt, Lyndal J. Trevena, Kevin McGeechan, Karen Carey, Ronald M. Epstein, Phyllis N. Butow, Chris B. Del Mar, Vikki Entwistle, Martin H.N. Tattersall |
Abstract |
To test the effect of three questions (what are my options? what are the benefits and harms? and how likely are these?), on information provided by physicians about treatment options. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 9 | 19% |
United States | 9 | 19% |
United Kingdom | 9 | 19% |
Australia | 6 | 13% |
Canada | 2 | 4% |
Belgium | 1 | 2% |
South Africa | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 11 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 33 | 69% |
Scientists | 7 | 15% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 10% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 274 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 8 | 3% |
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 262 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 49 | 18% |
Student > Master | 43 | 16% |
Researcher | 35 | 13% |
Other | 23 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 19 | 7% |
Other | 58 | 21% |
Unknown | 47 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 93 | 34% |
Psychology | 35 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 31 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 8% |
Computer Science | 5 | 2% |
Other | 24 | 9% |
Unknown | 64 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2022.
All research outputs
#751,091
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Patient Education & Counseling
#60
of 4,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,859
of 132,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient Education & Counseling
#4
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,194 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.