↓ Skip to main content

Thermography Based Breast Cancer Detection Using Texture Features and Support Vector Machine

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Systems, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
240 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
223 Mendeley
Title
Thermography Based Breast Cancer Detection Using Texture Features and Support Vector Machine
Published in
Journal of Medical Systems, October 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10916-010-9611-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

U. Rajendra Acharya, E. Y. K. Ng, Jen-Hong Tan, S. Vinitha Sree

Abstract

Breast cancer is a leading cause of death nowadays in women throughout the world. In developed countries, it is the most common type of cancer in women, and it is the second or third most common malignancy in developing countries. The cancer incidence is gradually increasing and remains a significant public health concern. The limitations of mammography as a screening and diagnostic modality, especially in young women with dense breasts, necessitated the development of novel and more effective strategies with high sensitivity and specificity. Thermal imaging (thermography) is a noninvasive imaging procedure used to record the thermal patterns using Infrared (IR) camera. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of using thermal imaging as a potential tool for detecting breast cancer. In this work, we have used 50 IR breast images (25 normal and 25 cancerous) collected from Singapore General Hospital, Singapore. Texture features were extracted from co-occurrence matrix and run length matrix. Subsequently, these features were fed to the Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier for automatic classification of normal and malignant breast conditions. Our proposed system gave an accuracy of 88.10%, sensitivity and specificity of 85.71% and 90.48% respectively.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 219 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 16%
Student > Bachelor 19 9%
Researcher 18 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Other 45 20%
Unknown 51 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 60 27%
Computer Science 42 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 23 10%
Unknown 58 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2019.
All research outputs
#4,163,793
of 22,749,166 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Systems
#125
of 1,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,134
of 99,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Systems
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,749,166 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,144 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,255 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.