↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating climate change vulnerability assessments: a case study of research focusing on the built environment in northern Canada

Overview of attention for article published in Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
Title
Evaluating climate change vulnerability assessments: a case study of research focusing on the built environment in northern Canada
Published in
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, March 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11027-014-9543-x
Authors

James D. Ford, Clara Champalle, Pamela Tudge, Rudy Riedlsperger, Trevor Bell, Erik Sparling

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 97 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 20%
Student > Master 19 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 17%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 27 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 28 28%
Social Sciences 20 20%
Engineering 6 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 5%
Arts and Humanities 3 3%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 28 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2023.
All research outputs
#3,602,989
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change
#233
of 702 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,365
of 228,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 702 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,110 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.