↓ Skip to main content

Psychological variables associated with foot function and foot pain in patients with plantar heel pain

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Rheumatology, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
21 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
Title
Psychological variables associated with foot function and foot pain in patients with plantar heel pain
Published in
Clinical Rheumatology, March 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10067-014-2565-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew P. Cotchett, Glen Whittaker, Bircan Erbas

Abstract

It is widely accepted that psychological variables are associated with self-reported pain and self-reported physical function in patients with musculoskeletal pain. However, the relationship between psychological variables and foot pain and foot function has not been evaluated in people with plantar heel pain. Eighty-four participants with plantar heel pain completed the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale short version (DASS-21) and Foot Health Status Questionnaire. Using a hierarchical regression analysis, a baseline model with age, sex and BMI explained 10 % of the variability in foot function. The addition of depression and stress in separate models explained an additional 7.3 % and 8.1 % of foot function scores, respectively. In the respective models, depression was a significant predictor (β = -0.28; p = 0.009) as was stress (β = -0.29; p = 0.006). Females drove the effect between stress and foot function (β = -0.50; p = 0.001) and depression and foot function (β = -0.53; p < 0.001). In regression models for foot pain, depression, anxiety and stress did not contribute significantly to pain scores. When the data was stratified by sex, stress (β = -0.36; p = 0.024) and depression (β = -0.41; p = 0.013) were significantly associated with foot pain in females but not in males. For participants with plantar heel pain, stress and depression scores were significantly associated with foot function but not foot pain. When the data was stratified by sex, stress and depression were significant predictors of foot pain and function in females.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Unknown 66 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 15%
Student > Master 9 13%
Other 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Researcher 5 7%
Other 17 25%
Unknown 15 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 19 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Psychology 3 4%
Sports and Recreations 3 4%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 18 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2019.
All research outputs
#2,822,096
of 23,314,015 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Rheumatology
#372
of 3,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,122
of 224,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Rheumatology
#4
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,314,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,653 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.