↓ Skip to main content

Analysis of Big Data in Gait Biomechanics: Current Trends and Future Directions

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 108)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
39 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
121 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
397 Mendeley
Title
Analysis of Big Data in Gait Biomechanics: Current Trends and Future Directions
Published in
Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s40846-017-0297-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Angkoon Phinyomark, Giovanni Petri, Esther Ibáñez-Marcelo, Sean T. Osis, Reed Ferber

Abstract

The increasing amount of data in biomechanics research has greatly increased the importance of developing advanced multivariate analysis and machine learning techniques, which are better able to handle "big data". Consequently, advances in data science methods will expand the knowledge for testing new hypotheses about biomechanical risk factors associated with walking and running gait-related musculoskeletal injury. This paper begins with a brief introduction to an automated three-dimensional (3D) biomechanical gait data collection system: 3D GAIT, followed by how the studies in the field of gait biomechanics fit the quantities in the 5 V's definition of big data: volume, velocity, variety, veracity, and value. Next, we provide a review of recent research and development in multivariate and machine learning methods-based gait analysis that can be applied to big data analytics. These modern biomechanical gait analysis methods include several main modules such as initial input features, dimensionality reduction (feature selection and extraction), and learning algorithms (classification and clustering). Finally, a promising big data exploration tool called "topological data analysis" and directions for future research are outlined and discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 397 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 397 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 66 17%
Student > Master 59 15%
Researcher 56 14%
Student > Bachelor 36 9%
Other 18 5%
Other 71 18%
Unknown 91 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 96 24%
Sports and Recreations 48 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 8%
Computer Science 29 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 4%
Other 54 14%
Unknown 124 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,468,897
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering
#3
of 108 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,345
of 286,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 108 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.