↓ Skip to main content

The global burden of low back pain: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 7,834)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
99 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
5 policy sources
twitter
118 X users
patent
4 patents
facebook
20 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
8 Google+ users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
2049 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2477 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The global burden of low back pain: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study
Published in
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, March 2014
DOI 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204428
Pubmed ID
Authors

Damian Hoy, Lyn March, Peter Brooks, Fiona Blyth, Anthony Woolf, Christopher Bain, Gail Williams, Emma Smith, Theo Vos, Jan Barendregt, Chris Murray, Roy Burstein, Rachelle Buchbinder

Abstract

To estimate the global burden of low back pain (LBP).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 118 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,477 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 2459 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 403 16%
Student > Bachelor 359 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 214 9%
Researcher 182 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 138 6%
Other 419 17%
Unknown 762 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 632 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 395 16%
Engineering 126 5%
Sports and Recreations 100 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 65 3%
Other 310 13%
Unknown 849 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 885. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2024.
All research outputs
#20,354
of 25,863,888 outputs
Outputs from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
#4
of 7,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93
of 237,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
#1
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,863,888 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,834 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,856 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.