↓ Skip to main content

Thrombolysis ImPlementation in Stroke (TIPS): evaluating the effectiveness of a strategy to increase the adoption of best evidence practice – protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial in…

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Thrombolysis ImPlementation in Stroke (TIPS): evaluating the effectiveness of a strategy to increase the adoption of best evidence practice – protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial in acute stroke care
Published in
Implementation Science, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-9-38
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christine L Paul, Christopher R Levi, Catherine A D’Este, Mark W Parsons, Christopher F Bladin, Richard I Lindley, John R Attia, Frans Henskens, Erin Lalor, Mark Longworth, Sandy Middleton, Annika Ryan, Erin Kerr, Robert W Sanson-Fisher, the Thrombolysis ImPlementation in Stroke (TIPS) Study Group

Abstract

Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability internationally. One of the three effective interventions in the acute phase of stroke care is thrombolytic therapy with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), if given within 4.5 hours of onset to appropriate cases of ischaemic stroke.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 108 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 16%
Student > Master 15 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 5%
Other 21 19%
Unknown 32 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 19%
Psychology 8 7%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 37 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2014.
All research outputs
#13,405,680
of 22,749,166 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,413
of 1,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,879
of 224,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#32
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,749,166 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,721 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,281 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.