↓ Skip to main content

Chemometrics-Assisted Effect-Directed Analysis of Crude and Refined Oil Using Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography–Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science & Technology, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chemometrics-Assisted Effect-Directed Analysis of Crude and Refined Oil Using Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography–Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry
Published in
Environmental Science & Technology, February 2014
DOI 10.1021/es404859m
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jagoš R. Radović, Kevin V. Thomas, Hadi Parastar, Sergi Díez, Romà Tauler, Josep M. Bayona

Abstract

An effect-directed analysis (EDA) of fresh and artificially weathered (evaporated, photooxidized) samples of North Sea crude oil and residual heavy fuel oil is presented. Aliphatic, aromatic, and polar oil fractions were tested for the presence of aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) agonist and androgen receptor (AR) antagonist, demonstrating for the first time the AR antagonist effects in the aromatic and, to a lesser extent, polar fractions. An extension of the typical EDA strategy to include an N-way partial least-squares (N-PLS) model capable of relating the comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC × GC-TOFMS) data set to the bioassay data obtained from normal-phase LC fractions is proposed. The predicted AhR binding effects in the fresh and artificially weathered aromatic oil fractions facilitated the identification of alkyl-substituted three- and four-ring aromatic systems in the active fractions through the weighting of their contributions to the observed effects. A N-PLS chemometric model is demonstrated as a potentially useful strategy for future EDA studies that can streamline the compound identification process and provide additional reduction of samples' complexity. The AhR binding effects of the suspected compounds predicted by N-PLS and identified by GC × GC-TOFMS were confirmed using quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) estimates.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 60 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 19%
Professor 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 9 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 26 42%
Environmental Science 14 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 8%
Engineering 2 3%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 11 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2015.
All research outputs
#15,092,197
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science & Technology
#15,296
of 20,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,452
of 237,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science & Technology
#169
of 254 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,675 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 254 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.