You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Glycated Hemoglobin Measurement and Prediction of Cardiovascular Disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jama.2014.1873 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emanuele Di Angelantonio, Pei Gao, Hassan Khan, Adam S Butterworth, David Wormser, Stephen Kaptoge, Sreenivasa Rao Kondapally Seshasai, Alex Thompson, Nadeem Sarwar, Peter Willeit, Paul M Ridker, Elizabeth L M Barr, Kay-Tee Khaw, Bruce M Psaty, Hermann Brenner, Beverley Balkau, Jacqueline M Dekker, Debbie A Lawlor, Makoto Daimon, Johann Willeit, Inger Njølstad, Aulikki Nissinen, Eric J Brunner, Lewis H Kuller, Jackie F Price, Johan Sundström, Matthew W Knuiman, Edith J M Feskens, W M M Verschuren, Nicholas Wald, Stephan J L Bakker, Peter H Whincup, Ian Ford, Uri Goldbourt, Agustín Gómez-de-la-Cámara, John Gallacher, Leon A Simons, Annika Rosengren, Susan E Sutherland, Cecilia Björkelund, Dan G Blazer, Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller, Altan Onat, Alejandro Marín Ibañez, Edoardo Casiglia, J Wouter Jukema, Lara M Simpson, Simona Giampaoli, Børge G Nordestgaard, Randi Selmer, Patrik Wennberg, Jussi Kauhanen, Jukka T Salonen, Rachel Dankner, Elizabeth Barrett-Connor, Maryam Kavousi, Vilmundur Gudnason, Denis Evans, Robert B Wallace, Mary Cushman, Ralph B D'Agostino, Jason G Umans, Yutaka Kiyohara, Hidaeki Nakagawa, Shinichi Sato, Richard F Gillum, Aaron R Folsom, Yvonne T van der Schouw, Karel G Moons, Simon J Griffin, Naveed Sattar, Nicholas J Wareham, Elizabeth Selvin, Simon G Thompson, John Danesh |
| Abstract |
The value of measuring levels of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) for the prediction of first cardiovascular events is uncertain. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 95 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 18 | 19% |
| United States | 10 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 5% |
| Canada | 4 | 4% |
| Mexico | 4 | 4% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Japan | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Peru | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 44 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 74 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 14 | 15% |
| Scientists | 7 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 267 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 257 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 17% |
| Researcher | 42 | 16% |
| Professor | 26 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 70 | 26% |
| Unknown | 45 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 146 | 55% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 11 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 25 | 9% |
| Unknown | 59 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 108. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2021.
All research outputs
#395,183
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#4,593
of 36,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,275
of 240,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#46
of 383 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,763 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,378 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 383 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.