↓ Skip to main content

Macroclimate Determines the Global Range Limit of Aedes aegypti

Overview of attention for article published in EcoHealth, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#50 of 706)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
Title
Macroclimate Determines the Global Range Limit of Aedes aegypti
Published in
EcoHealth, March 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10393-014-0918-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

César Capinha, Jorge Rocha, Carla A. Sousa

Abstract

Aedes aegypti is the main vector of dengue and a number of other diseases worldwide. Because of the domestic nature of this mosquito, the relative importance of macroclimate in shaping its distribution has been a controversial issue. We have captured here the worldwide macroclimatic conditions occupied by A. aegypti in the last century. We assessed the ability of this information to predict the species' observed distribution using supra-continental spatially-uncorrelated data. We further projected the distribution of the colonized climates in the near future (2010-2039) under two climate-change scenarios. Our results indicate that the macroclimate is largely responsible for setting the maximum range limit of A. aegypti worldwide and that in the near future, relatively wide areas beyond this limit will receive macroclimates previously occupied by the species. By comparing our projections, with those from a previous model based strictly on species-climate relationships (i.e., excluding human influence), we also found support for the hypothesis that much of the species' range in temperate and subtropical regions is being sustained by artificial environments. Altogether, these findings suggest that, if the domestic environments commonly exploited by this species are available in the newly suitable areas, its distribution may expand considerably in the near future.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 1%
Spain 2 1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 123 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 16%
Student > Bachelor 17 12%
Student > Master 14 10%
Other 11 8%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 22 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 34%
Environmental Science 15 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 9%
Social Sciences 8 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 5%
Other 19 14%
Unknown 28 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2016.
All research outputs
#716,901
of 22,749,166 outputs
Outputs from EcoHealth
#50
of 706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,531
of 223,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EcoHealth
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,749,166 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 706 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.