↓ Skip to main content

Birth cohorts in asthma and allergic diseases: Report of a NIAID/NHLBI/MeDALL joint workshop

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Birth cohorts in asthma and allergic diseases: Report of a NIAID/NHLBI/MeDALL joint workshop
Published in
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, March 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.01.018
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jean Bousquet, James E. Gern, Fernando D. Martinez, Josep M. Anto, Christine C. Johnson, Patrick G. Holt, Robert F. Lemanske, Peter N. Le Souëf, Robert S. Tepper, Erika R.M. von Mutius, S. Hasan Arshad, Leonard B. Bacharier, Allan Becker, Kathleen Belanger, Anna Bergström, David I. Bernstein, Michael D. Cabana, Kecia N. Carroll, Mario Castro, Philip J. Cooper, Matthew W. Gillman, Diane R. Gold, John Henderson, Joachim Heinrich, Soo-Jong Hong, Daniel J. Jackson, Thomas Keil, Anita L. Kozyrskyj, Karin C. Lødrup Carlsen, Rachel L. Miller, Isabelle Momas, Wayne J. Morgan, Patricia Noel, Dennis R. Ownby, Mariona Pinart, Patrick H. Ryan, Julie M. Schwaninger, Malcolm R. Sears, Angela Simpson, Henriette A. Smit, Debra A. Stern, Padmaja Subbarao, Rudolf Valenta, Xiaobin Wang, Scott T. Weiss, Robert Wood, Anne L. Wright, Rosalind J. Wright, Alkis Togias, Peter J. Gergen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 187 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 15%
Researcher 25 13%
Student > Bachelor 21 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 7%
Other 36 19%
Unknown 51 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 39%
Social Sciences 14 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Environmental Science 6 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 2%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 64 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2019.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
#6,579
of 11,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,133
of 239,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
#81
of 149 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,477 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,567 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 149 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.